Community Interest Company for Sports Clubs: Is a CIC the Right Structure for Your Club?
- Admin
- 2 hours ago
- 7 min read
Could a community interest company be the right structure for your sports club? For clubs that want the protection of incorporation, a clear community purpose and the flexibility to pay directors or generate income commercially, a CIC offers an interesting option. But it comes with real limitations that every club should understand before deciding.
What Is a Community Interest Company for Sports Clubs?
A Community Interest Company (CIC) is a type of limited company created specifically for organisations that want to operate for the benefit of the community rather than for private financial gain. The CIC model was introduced in 2005 and is regulated by the CIC Regulator, which sits within Companies House.
A community interest company for sports clubs works in a similar way to an ordinary company. It has a board of directors, a set of Articles of Association as its governing document, and is registered at Companies House. The key difference is that a CIC must demonstrate it is operating for community benefit, and its assets are subject to an asset lock, meaning they can only be used for the benefit of the community and cannot be distributed to members for private gain.
A CIC can be structured either as a company limited by guarantee or as a company limited by shares. For most grassroots sports clubs, the company limited by guarantee model is the more appropriate of the two, as it avoids the complications of issuing and transferring shares each time membership changes.
Why Some Sports Clubs Consider a CIC
The CIC structure occupies an interesting middle ground between a standard Company Limited by Guarantee and a fully charitable organisation. There are a number of reasons why some sports clubs are drawn to it.
Limited Liability. Like any incorporated company, a CIC gives the club a separate legal identity. This means the club itself enters into contracts, holds assets and takes on liabilities, rather than individual committee members or directors doing so personally. Members' personal liability is limited, which provides meaningful protection for those running the organisation.
Directors Can Be Paid. This is one of the features that most clearly distinguishes a CIC from a charity. Charity law requires that the majority of trustees in a charitable organisation cannot receive remuneration for holding that role. A CIC has no such restriction. Directors of a CIC can be paid for their services, provided the level of remuneration is reasonable and consistent with the community interest test. The CIC Regulator has made clear that it recognises the importance of CICs being able to attract and reward capable people and will only intervene in exceptional circumstances. For clubs with paid staff in leadership roles, or those looking to professionalise their management, this flexibility can be attractive.
The Community Interest Test Is Broadly Defined. To register as a CIC, the club must satisfy the community interest test. This requires demonstrating that a reasonable person would consider the club's activities to be for the benefit of the community or a wider section of the public. Community can be defined geographically, by age group, by socioeconomic need or in other ways. Many amateur sports clubs would pass this test without difficulty, making the CIC accessible to a wide range of organisations.
Asset Lock Builds Credibility. The mandatory asset lock built into every CIC means that the club's assets are protected for community benefit and cannot be taken out by directors or members for private gain. For clubs that want to demonstrate to their local authority, funders or the wider public that the organisation genuinely exists for the good of the community, the asset lock provides a visible and credible signal of that commitment.
Potential to Issue Shares. For clubs structured as a CIC limited by shares, there is the option to issue shares to investors, subject to a dividend cap of 20% of the paid up value per share, with total dividends capped at 35% of distributable profits. This can provide a mechanism for raising capital from supporters or community investors who want a limited financial return while also supporting their local club. This model has been used by some community owned football clubs.
Registration Is Relatively Straightforward. Incorporating as a CIC follows a similar process to forming an ordinary company, with the addition of a Form CIC36 which sets out how the club will benefit the community. The CIC Regulator aims to process applications within five working days, and in practice most clubs are registered within two weeks of submitting their documentation.
Which Clubs Is a CIC Best Suited To?
A community interest company for sports clubs tends to be most relevant in a specific set of circumstances.
Clubs that want to operate commercially but still demonstrate community purpose. The CIC model was designed with social enterprises in mind. It is less restrictive than charitable status in terms of permitted activities, which means clubs can trade, generate income and operate commercially without the same constraints that apply to charities, while still clearly signalling their community orientation through the CIC structure.
Clubs where directors or senior staff need to be paid. Where a club is at a stage of development where it needs to bring in paid executive leadership, and where charitable status is not being pursued, a CIC offers a structure in which this is permitted in a way that a standard CLG can also accommodate but a charity cannot.
Community owned clubs seeking investment. Where a club wants to raise capital from the community through shares, the CIC limited by shares model provides a recognised and regulated framework for doing so with appropriate protections in place for investors.
Clubs that want incorporated status without seeking charitable status. Some clubs do not meet the requirements for charitable status, or do not wish to take on the obligations that come with it. A CIC offers incorporated status and a clear community purpose without the need to register as a charity.
The Limitations You Must Understand
The CIC structure has genuine uses, but it is important to go in with a clear understanding of its limitations. For many sports clubs, a CIC will not be the most suitable option, and it is worth understanding why.
A CIC receives no tax advantages. This is perhaps the most significant limitation for most sports clubs. Unlike a CASC or a registered charity, a CIC does not benefit from any preferential tax treatment. There is no access to Gift Aid, no business rate relief through CIC status alone, and no Corporation Tax exemptions. The full range of standard company taxation applies. For clubs that rely on donations, own their own premises or generate significant income, this absence of tax relief is a material disadvantage compared to other structures.
It is less familiar to many funders. Charitable status carries significant weight with many grant making bodies, trusts and public funders. Some funding streams are restricted to registered charities, and CICs do not qualify for these. While certain funders do recognise and support CICs, particularly those focused on social enterprise and community development, the funding landscape for a CIC is generally narrower than for a charity. Research by some organisations in the sport sector has suggested that CICs tend to fare less well in the grant funding market than charitable structures.
There are additional reporting obligations. As well as the standard annual accounts and confirmation statement required of all companies, a CIC must also file an annual community interest report with the CIC Regulator. This report must demonstrate how the CIC has benefited the community over the past year and how it has involved stakeholders in its activities. This adds to the administrative burden compared to a standard CLG.
Deregistration is very difficult. Once a club's assets are subject to the CIC asset lock, it is difficult to undo this. A CIC can convert to full charitable status, but it cannot simply deregister as a CIC and revert to being a standard company. This is a one way door that clubs must be clear about before committing.
It may be unnecessarily complex for most clubs. For clubs that simply want to operate on a not for profit basis with the protection of incorporation, a standard Company Limited by Guarantee will almost always be simpler, cheaper to administer and more familiar to banks, accountants and local authorities. The CIC adds an additional layer of regulation and reporting without providing the tax benefits that might justify that additional complexity for the majority of amateur clubs.
CIC vs CLG vs CASC: Where Does the CIC Fit?
Compared to a standard CLG, a CIC provides a more explicit community purpose signal through the asset lock and community interest test, and allows directors to be paid. But it adds regulatory complexity and filing obligations without any of the tax advantages that a CLG with CASC status would bring.
Compared to a CLG with CASC status, the CIC offers more commercial flexibility and no player payment restrictions, but loses all the tax reliefs that make CASC registration so financially valuable for many clubs.
Compared to charitable status through a CIO or SCIO, the CIC lacks the full charitable tax package including Gift Aid on membership fees, business rate relief, VAT reliefs and access to charity only funding.
For most grassroots sports clubs, the CIC sits in a gap between structures rather than being the obvious best option. The cases where it makes most sense are those where a club specifically needs the ability to pay directors, wants to raise community share capital, or is operating in a way that makes the commercial flexibility of the CIC genuinely valuable over and above what a CLG could offer.
How Club Development Solutions Can Help
At Club Development Solutions, we help sports clubs assess all of their structural options clearly and make the decision that is genuinely right for their club, not just the one that sounds most appealing on first read. We work with clubs to understand whether a community interest company is the right fit, whether an alternative structure would serve them better, and how to move forward in a way that protects the club and positions it for long term success.
If you are thinking about incorporating your sports club and want to understand whether a CIC, a CLG, a CASC or a charitable structure is the right answer for your situation, we would love to have that conversation with you.
Email Andrew directly at andrew@clubdevelopmentsolutions.com to arrange an initial call to discuss your club.
Also in this series:
Comments